On Thursday, June 30, 2016 2:50:44 PM CEST Christopher Covington wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 06/30/2016 07:52 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 30, 2016 7:35:14 AM CEST Christopher Covington wrote:
> >> Hi Arnd,
> >>
> >> On 06/08/2016 05:02 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, J
Hi Arnd,
On 06/30/2016 07:52 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, June 30, 2016 7:35:14 AM CEST Christopher Covington wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> On 06/08/2016 05:02 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 12:19:44 PM CEST Austin Christ wrote:
+ ret = device_prop
On Thursday, June 30, 2016 7:35:14 AM CEST Christopher Covington wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 06/08/2016 05:02 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 12:19:44 PM CEST Austin Christ wrote:
> >> + ret = device_property_read_u32(qup->dev,
> >> +
Hi Arnd,
On 06/08/2016 05:02 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 12:19:44 PM CEST Austin Christ wrote:
>> + ret = device_property_read_u32(qup->dev,
>> + "src-clock-hz", &src_clk_freq);
>> + if (ret) {
>> +
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Use has_acpi_companion() if you need to.
>
> Is has_acpi_companion() the preferred alternative to ACPI_HANDLE()? We
> frequently need to write code that does something different on ACPI vs DT,
> and there doe
Mika Westerberg wrote:
Use has_acpi_companion() if you need to.
Is has_acpi_companion() the preferred alternative to ACPI_HANDLE()? We
frequently need to write code that does something different on ACPI vs
DT, and there doesn't appear to be much consistency on how that's handled.
--
Sent b
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 04:10:34PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:19:44PM -0600, Austin Christ wrote:
> > From: Naveen Kaje
> >
> > Add support to get the device parameters from ACPI. Assume
> > that the clocks are managed by firmware.
>
> Adding Mika to CC: Can you have
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:19:44PM -0600, Austin Christ wrote:
> From: Naveen Kaje
>
> Add support to get the device parameters from ACPI. Assume
> that the clocks are managed by firmware.
Adding Mika to CC: Can you have a look at the ACPI binding? Looks ok to
me...
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen K
Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.7-rc2 next-20160609]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Austin-Christ/i2c-qup-add-ACPI-support/20160609-0
On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 12:19:44 PM CEST Austin Christ wrote:
> + ret = device_property_read_u32(qup->dev,
> + "src-clock-hz", &src_clk_freq);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_warn(qup->dev, "using default src-clock-hz %d",
>
From: Naveen Kaje
Add support to get the device parameters from ACPI. Assume
that the clocks are managed by firmware.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje
Signed-off-by: Austin Christ
Reviewed-by: sricha...@codeaurora.org
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c | 59 ---
11 matches
Mail list logo