You want to submit or should I?
Whatever is easier for you
You're the owner, you should go ahead with it. Thanks!
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 01:59:00PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> You want to submit or should I?
Whatever is easier for you
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90
Looks good (both #1 if we want to use the two patch version or #2).
I have no idea what I did when I was trying to do when I tried it.
You want to submit or should I?
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 04:31:28PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>
> On 06/25/2018 10:08 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 05:09:27PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > > We are going to need it for traffic based keep alive to update
> > > that we saw a completion to extend t
On 06/25/2018 10:08 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 05:09:27PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
We are going to need it for traffic based keep alive to update
that we saw a completion to extend the kato.
But I suggest you simply keep a ctrl reference in struct nvme_request
i
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 05:09:27PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> We are going to need it for traffic based keep alive to update
> that we saw a completion to extend the kato.
>
> But I suggest you simply keep a ctrl reference in struct nvme_request
> instead so you don't need to pass it to nvme_co
On 06/11/2018 09:46 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
Add disk name to tracepoints so we can better distinguish between
individual disks in the trace output.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn
---
I'm not entirely sure if this adding the ctrl pointers to
nvme_complete_rq() and nvme_setup_cmd()
Add disk name to tracepoints so we can better distinguish between
individual disks in the trace output.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn
---
I'm not entirely sure if this adding the ctrl pointers to
nvme_complete_rq() and nvme_setup_cmd() is a good idea, it's the
fast-path after all.
Changes
8 matches
Mail list logo
