Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation

2020-05-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig

Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation

2020-05-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:33:23PM +0200, Martijn Coenen wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:30 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > For some reason this fails to apply for me against both > > Jens' for-5.8/block and Linus' current tree. > > > > What is the baseline for this series? > > This was bas

Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation

2020-05-01 Thread Martijn Coenen
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:30 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > For some reason this fails to apply for me against both > Jens' for-5.8/block and Linus' current tree. > > What is the baseline for this series? This was based on Linus' tree from a week or two ago or so, but I think you're most likely m

Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation

2020-05-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
For some reason this fails to apply for me against both Jens' for-5.8/block and Linus' current tree. What is the baseline for this series?

[PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation

2020-04-29 Thread Martijn Coenen
figure_loop_size() calculates the loop size based on the passed in parameters, but at the same time it updates the offset and sizelimit parameters in the loop device configuration. That is a somewhat unexpected side effect of a function with this name, and it is only only needed by one of the two c