Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-16 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:22:01AM +, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:02:48PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > > > The bad news is that N800 no longer boots -- or the UART dies during > > > serial init: > > > > > > http:

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-15 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:02:48PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > The bad news is that N800 no longer boots -- or the UART dies during > > serial init: > > > > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_tty_next_e36851d0/20120910020323/boot/2420n800/24

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-12 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:25:30PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:02:48PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > > > The bad news is that N800 no longer boots -- or the UART dies during > > > serial init: > > > > > > ht

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-12 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hi On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:02:48PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > The bad news is that N800 no longer boots -- or the UART dies during > > serial init: > > > > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_tty_next_e36851d0/20120910020323/boot/2420n80

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-11 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:02:48PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Hi Felipe > > Just tested these OMAP serial changes at commit > e36851d0fa94b0f7802b3cc80406dbd3ef4f2f16 ("serial: omap: fix compile > breakage"). There's good news and bad news... > > The good news is that after applying

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-11 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hi Felipe Just tested these OMAP serial changes at commit e36851d0fa94b0f7802b3cc80406dbd3ef4f2f16 ("serial: omap: fix compile breakage"). There's good news and bad news... The good news is that after applying this series, the 'OMAP4 UART garbage on long transmit buffers when PM is enabled'

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-11 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 05:01:06PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti wrote: > On Sunday 09 September 2012 12:34 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> In addition, IMO, if this was only tested on Panda (as suggested by > >> > earlier cover letters), it really should not have been merged until it > >> > got some broader te

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-11 Thread Shubhrajyoti
On Sunday 09 September 2012 12:34 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> In addition, IMO, if this was only tested on Panda (as suggested by >> > earlier cover letters), it really should not have been merged until it >> > got some broader testing. > Shubhro's got his Tested-by tag. I believe he tested on beagl

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-08 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 01:53:11PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Felipe Balbi writes: > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:44:13PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Felipe Balbi writes: > >> > >> > Hi guys, > >> > > >> > here's v4 of the omap uart patchset. No changes other than a reb

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-07 Thread Kevin Hilman
Felipe Balbi writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:44:13PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Felipe Balbi writes: >> >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > here's v4 of the omap uart patchset. No changes other than a rebase on top >> > of >> > Greg's tty-next branch and Tony's Acked-by being added to a co

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-06 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:44:13PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Felipe Balbi writes: > > > Hi guys, > > > > here's v4 of the omap uart patchset. No changes other than a rebase on top > > of > > Greg's tty-next branch and Tony's Acked-by being added to a couple patches > > > > Note: I'm rese

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-06 Thread Kevin Hilman
Felipe Balbi writes: > Hi guys, > > here's v4 of the omap uart patchset. No changes other than a rebase on top of > Greg's tty-next branch and Tony's Acked-by being added to a couple patches > > Note: I'm resending the series with Vikram's Software Flow Control fix anyway > as it can just be igno

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-06 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hi On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi guys, > > here's v4 of the omap uart patchset. No changes other than a rebase on top of > Greg's tty-next branch and Tony's Acked-by being added to a couple patches > > Note: I'm resending the series with Vikram's Software Flow Control fix anyway

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-06 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:18:35AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:45:19PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > here's v4 of the omap uart patchset. No changes other than a rebase on top > > of > > Greg's tty-next branch and Tony's Acked-by being added to a couple pa

Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-06 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:45:19PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi guys, > > here's v4 of the omap uart patchset. No changes other than a rebase on top of > Greg's tty-next branch and Tony's Acked-by being added to a couple patches > > Note: I'm resending the series with Vikram's Software Flow Co

[PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

2012-09-06 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi guys, here's v4 of the omap uart patchset. No changes other than a rebase on top of Greg's tty-next branch and Tony's Acked-by being added to a couple patches Note: I'm resending the series with Vikram's Software Flow Control fix anyway as it can just be ignored if it's decided it needs to go