Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] vfs: add the ability to retry on ESTALE to several syscalls

2012/7/27, Jeff Layton : > On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:15:23 +0900 > Namjae Jeon wrote: > >> Hi Jeff. >> >> Which testcase(or test method) do I use to know improved point from >> ESTALE error ? >> I want to know before & after using testcase with this patch-set. >> > > It's a bit labor intensive, I'm a

Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] vfs: add the ability to retry on ESTALE to several syscalls

On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:15:23 +0900 Namjae Jeon wrote: > Hi Jeff. > > Which testcase(or test method) do I use to know improved point from > ESTALE error ? > I want to know before & after using testcase with this patch-set. > It's a bit labor intensive, I'm afraid... Attached is a cleaned-up co

Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] vfs: add the ability to retry on ESTALE to several syscalls

Hi Jeff. Which testcase(or test method) do I use to know improved point from ESTALE error ? I want to know before & after using testcase with this patch-set. Thanks. 2012/7/26, Jeff Layton : > This patchset is a respin of the one I sent on June 29th. The main > reason for the resend is to deal w

[PATCH v4 00/17] vfs: add the ability to retry on ESTALE to several syscalls

This patchset is a respin of the one I sent on June 29th. The main reason for the resend is to deal with some minor merge conflicts that have cropped up due to recent changes. This series depends on the "audit" series that I sent earlier today. It's also available via the "estale" branch of my git