On 06/03/2014 07:28 PM, FanWu wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 12:49 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/03/2014 01:37 AM, f...@marvell.com wrote:
>>> From: Fan Wu
>>>
>>> What the patch did:
>>> 1.To call pinmux_disable_setting ahead of pinmux_enable_setting in
>>> each time of
>>>calling pinctrl_select
On 06/04/2014 12:49 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/03/2014 01:37 AM, f...@marvell.com wrote:
From: Fan Wu
What the patch did:
1.To call pinmux_disable_setting ahead of pinmux_enable_setting in each time of
calling pinctrl_select_state
2.Remove the HW disable operation in in pinmux_disable_
On 06/03/2014 01:37 AM, f...@marvell.com wrote:
> From: Fan Wu
>
> What the patch did:
> 1.To call pinmux_disable_setting ahead of pinmux_enable_setting in each time
> of
> calling pinctrl_select_state
> 2.Remove the HW disable operation in in pinmux_disable_setting function.
> 3.Remove the di
On 06/03/2014 01:48 AM, FanWu wrote:
> On 06/03/2014 03:37 PM, f...@marvell.com wrote:
>> From: Fan Wu
>>
>> What the patch did:
>> 1.To call pinmux_disable_setting ahead of pinmux_enable_setting in
>> each time of
>>calling pinctrl_select_state
>> 2.Remove the HW disable operation in in pinmu
On 06/03/2014 03:37 PM, f...@marvell.com wrote:
From: Fan Wu
What the patch did:
1.To call pinmux_disable_setting ahead of pinmux_enable_setting in each time of
calling pinctrl_select_state
2.Remove the HW disable operation in in pinmux_disable_setting function.
3.Remove the disable ops in s
From: Fan Wu
What the patch did:
1.To call pinmux_disable_setting ahead of pinmux_enable_setting in each time of
calling pinctrl_select_state
2.Remove the HW disable operation in in pinmux_disable_setting function.
3.Remove the disable ops in struct pinmux_ops
The reason why to do this is that
6 matches
Mail list logo
