On 12/18/2013 06:48 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Peter Hurley wrote:
Is this a 3.13-final thing, or can it wait for 3.14-rc1?
Definitely not 3.13 at this point -- it should go to -next.
Please earmark it for stable, if possible. This fixes a rather annoying lon
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >Is this a 3.13-final thing, or can it wait for 3.14-rc1?
>
> Definitely not 3.13 at this point -- it should go to -next.
Please earmark it for stable, if possible. This fixes a rather annoying long
time bug, after all...
--
"One disk to rule them al
On 12/16/2013 07:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 05:12:02PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
readline() inadvertently triggers an error recovery path when
pastes larger than 4k overrun the line discipline buffer. The
error recovery path discards input when the line discipline
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 05:12:02PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> readline() inadvertently triggers an error recovery path when
> pastes larger than 4k overrun the line discipline buffer. The
> error recovery path discards input when the line discipline buffer
> is full and operating in canonical mod
readline() inadvertently triggers an error recovery path when
pastes larger than 4k overrun the line discipline buffer. The
error recovery path discards input when the line discipline buffer
is full and operating in canonical mode and no newline has been
received. Because readline() changes the ter
5 matches
Mail list logo
