Le 13/02/2019 à 11:34, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> So a single "no PCCH" message for this whole function should be sufficient.
Let's do that.
[...]
> And what did turn out to be the problem?
>
> Anyway, pr_info() should be sufficient IMO.
You should be pretty aware of 95d6c0857e54b78898274607
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:13 AM Erwan Velu wrote:
>
>
> Le 13/02/2019 à 00:01, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> [...]
> > Newline characters are missing in all of your messages.
>
> oops. Fixing this.
>
> > "ACPI _PSS not found\n"
>
> Done.
>
>
> >> return true;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -2484,
Le 13/02/2019 à 00:01, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
[...]
> Newline characters are missing in all of your messages.
oops. Fixing this.
> "ACPI _PSS not found\n"
Done.
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -2484,10 +2485,15 @@ static bool __init intel_pstate_no_acpi_pcch(void)
>> ac
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:09 AM Erwan Velu wrote:
>
> The init code path has several exceptions where the module can decide not to
> load.
> As CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE is generally set to Y, the return code is not
> reachable.
> The initialization code is neither verbose of the reason why it did
The init code path has several exceptions where the module can decide not to
load.
As CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE is generally set to Y, the return code is not
reachable.
The initialization code is neither verbose of the reason why it did choose to
prematurely exit.
This situation leads to a situat
5 matches
Mail list logo
