On 21/05/2013 16:15, Alex Rosenbaum wrote:
On 5/21/2013 3:29 PM, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
What benchmarks are you using to test poll/select/epoll?
for epoll/select latency tests we are using sockperf as performance
latency tool: https://code.google.com/p/sockperf/
It is a client-server based tool a
On 21/05/2013 21:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 15:29 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
Many of the questions you asked are covered in our RFC cover letter, but
I will touch them briefly
On 21/05/2013 15:06, Alex Rosenbaum wrote:
1. It seem this patch does not cover epoll/select an
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 15:29 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> Many of the questions you asked are covered in our RFC cover letter, but
> I will touch them briefly
>
> On 21/05/2013 15:06, Alex Rosenbaum wrote:
> > 1. It seem this patch does not cover epoll/select and such IO muxing APIs?
>
> We are
>> 2. How is the logic aware of RSS and RFS?
>>
>> With TCP sockets, the driver knows the specific ring it need to poll so
>> this should be mapped and provide the best latency.
>
>
> This code is blissfully oblivious of RFS and RSS, it only assumes that the
> packets for a socket are likely to con
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 16:15 +0300, Alex Rosenbaum wrote:
> On 5/21/2013 3:29 PM, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> > What benchmarks are you using to test poll/select/epoll?
> for epoll/select latency tests we are using sockperf as performance
> latency tool: https://code.google.com/p/sockperf/
> It is a cli
On 5/21/2013 3:29 PM, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
What benchmarks are you using to test poll/select/epoll?
for epoll/select latency tests we are using sockperf as performance
latency tool: https://code.google.com/p/sockperf/
It is a client-server based tool and it supported ping-pong, throughput,
and
Many of the questions you asked are covered in our RFC cover letter, but
I will touch them briefly
On 21/05/2013 15:06, Alex Rosenbaum wrote:
1. It seem this patch does not cover epoll/select and such IO muxing APIs?
We are thinking about how to implement epoll support as one of the next
ste
On 5/20/2013 1:15 PM, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
updated with the comments I got so far.
Thanks,
Eliezer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello
updated with the comments I got so far.
Thanks,
Eliezer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkm
9 matches
Mail list logo
