Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] gpio-langwell: drop away explicit casting

2013-05-30 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Since the type of the reg_base member is void __iomem * we don't need to have > explicit casting in gpio_reg() and gpio_reg_2bit(). > > Update year in the copyright notice as well. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Patch applied with M

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] gpio-langwell: drop away explicit casting

2013-05-22 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:20:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Since the type of the reg_base member is void __iomem * we don't need to have > explicit casting in gpio_reg() and gpio_reg_2bit(). > > Update year in the copyright notice as well. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Acked-by: Mi

[PATCH v3 5/5] gpio-langwell: drop away explicit casting

2013-05-22 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Since the type of the reg_base member is void __iomem * we don't need to have explicit casting in gpio_reg() and gpio_reg_2bit(). Update year in the copyright notice as well. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c | 12 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 de