On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 9:08 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> I think the patch subject is stale.
>
> MODULE_ was the prefix in the previous v2 series.
>
> Now, the prefix part is module:
I will apply with the subject fixed, as "MODULE_" prefix does not make
sense any more.
"module: Extend the mo
I think the patch subject is stale.
MODULE_ was the prefix in the previous v2 series.
Now, the prefix part is module:
On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 11:25 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Instead of only accepting "module:${name}", extend it with a comma
> separated list of module names and add tail glob
On 5/2/25 16:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Instead of only accepting "module:${name}", extend it with a comma
> separated list of module names and add tail glob support.
>
> That is, something like: "module:foo-*,bar" is now possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Reviewed-by: Petr Pa
Instead of only accepting "module:${name}", extend it with a comma
separated list of module names and add tail glob support.
That is, something like: "module:foo-*,bar" is now possible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
---
kernel/module/main.c | 36 ++--
4 matches
Mail list logo
