Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] nvmem: core: skip nodes with compatibles other than "nvmem-cell"

Hello Kamel, On 30.12.20 14:43, Kamel Bouhara wrote: > Hi Ahmad, > > On 4/28/20 1:18 PM, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: >> The nvmem cell binding used to apply to all objects which match >> "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$", without taking a compatible into account, which >> precluded extension of EEPROMs by child nodes oth

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] nvmem: core: skip nodes with compatibles other than "nvmem-cell"

Hi Ahmad, On 4/28/20 1:18 PM, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: The nvmem cell binding used to apply to all objects which match "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$", without taking a compatible into account, which precluded extension of EEPROMs by child nodes other than nvmem. A previous commit changed the binding, so that nvme

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] nvmem: core: skip nodes with compatibles other than "nvmem-cell"

On 28/04/2020 12:18, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: The nvmem cell binding used to apply to all objects which match "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$", without taking a compatible into account, which precluded extension of EEPROMs by child nodes other than nvmem. A previous commit changed the binding, so that nvmem cells

[PATCH v3 2/2] nvmem: core: skip nodes with compatibles other than "nvmem-cell"

The nvmem cell binding used to apply to all objects which match "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$", without taking a compatible into account, which precluded extension of EEPROMs by child nodes other than nvmem. A previous commit changed the binding, so that nvmem cells that feature a compatible property must have