Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net/9p: add a per-client fcall kmem_cache

2018-08-09 Thread piaojun
Thanks for clearing my doubt, and you can add: Acked-by: Jun Piao On 2018/8/10 9:41, Dominique Martinet wrote: > piaojun wrote on Fri, Aug 10, 2018: >> Could you help paste the test result of before-after-applied this patch in >> comment? And please see my comments below. > > Thanks the the rev

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net/9p: add a per-client fcall kmem_cache

2018-08-09 Thread Dominique Martinet
piaojun wrote on Fri, Aug 10, 2018: > Could you help paste the test result of before-after-applied this patch in > comment? And please see my comments below. Thanks the the review, do you mean the commit message? I'll add the summary I wrote in reply to your question a few mails before. > > dif

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net/9p: add a per-client fcall kmem_cache

2018-08-09 Thread piaojun
Hi Dominique, Could you help paste the test result of before-after-applied this patch in comment? And please see my comments below. On 2018/8/9 22:33, Dominique Martinet wrote: > From: Dominique Martinet > > Having a specific cache for the fcall allocations helps speed up > allocations a bit, e

[PATCH v3 2/2] net/9p: add a per-client fcall kmem_cache

2018-08-09 Thread Dominique Martinet
From: Dominique Martinet Having a specific cache for the fcall allocations helps speed up allocations a bit, especially in case of non-"round" msizes. The caches will automatically be merged if there are multiple caches of items with the same size so we do not need to try to share a cache betwee