On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> It should not break ia64 by replacing acpi_numa_init with
>> acpi_numa_init_srat/acpi_numa_init_slit/acpi_num_arch_fixup.
>
> You are right - it doesn't break ia64. All my test configs still
>
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> It should not break ia64 by replacing acpi_numa_init with
> acpi_numa_init_srat/acpi_numa_init_slit/acpi_num_arch_fixup.
You are right - it doesn't break ia64. All my test configs still
build. Machines both with and without NUMA still boot and
We need to handle slit later, as it need to allocate buffer for distance
matrix. Also we do not need SLIT info before init_mem_mapping.
So move SLIT parsing later.
x86_acpi_numa_init become x86_acpi_numa_init_srat/x86_acpi_numa_init_slit.
It should not break ia64 by replacing acpi_numa_init with
3 matches
Mail list logo