Hi Boris,
2017-04-14 17:19 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:57:23 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>>
>> 2017-04-11 16:56 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
>> :
>> > Hi Masahiro,
>> >
>> > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:19:21 +0900
>> > Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:57:23 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
>
> 2017-04-11 16:56 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
> :
> > Hi Masahiro,
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:19:21 +0900
> > Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Boris,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-04-10 1:33 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
Hi Boris,
2017-04-11 16:56 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:19:21 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-04-10 1:33 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
>> :
>> > On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:16:34 +0900
>> > Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Boris
Hi Masahiro,
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:19:21 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
>
>
> 2017-04-10 1:33 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
> :
> > On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:16:34 +0900
> > Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Boris,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-03-31 18:46 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
> >>
Hi Boris,
2017-04-10 1:33 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:16:34 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-03-31 18:46 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
>> :
>>
>> > You can try something like that when no explicit ecc.strength and
>> > ecc.size has been set in
On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:16:34 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
>
>
> 2017-03-31 18:46 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
> :
>
> > You can try something like that when no explicit ecc.strength and
> > ecc.size has been set in the DT and when ECC_MAXIMIZE was not passed.
> >
> > static int
> >
Hi Boris,
2017-03-31 18:46 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
> You can try something like that when no explicit ecc.strength and
> ecc.size has been set in the DT and when ECC_MAXIMIZE was not passed.
>
> static int
> denali_get_closest_ecc_strength(struct denali_nand_info *denali,
>
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:06:32 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
>
> 2017-03-30 23:02 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
> :
> > On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:46:00 +0900
> > Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> >> Historically, this driver tried to choose as big ECC strength as
> >> possible, but it would
Hi Boris,
2017-03-30 23:02 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:46:00 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> Historically, this driver tried to choose as big ECC strength as
>> possible, but it would be reasonable to allow DT to set a particular
>> ECC strength with "nand-ecc-streng
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:46:00 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Historically, this driver tried to choose as big ECC strength as
> possible, but it would be reasonable to allow DT to set a particular
> ECC strength with "nand-ecc-strength" property. This is useful
> when a particular ECC setting is
Historically, this driver tried to choose as big ECC strength as
possible, but it would be reasonable to allow DT to set a particular
ECC strength with "nand-ecc-strength" property. This is useful
when a particular ECC setting is hard-coded by firmware (or hard-
wired by boot ROM).
If no ECC stre
11 matches
Mail list logo