On Thu 2020-07-02 11:41:34, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Now that the last callser has been removed remove this code from exec.
Typo "caller".
> For anyone thinking of resurrecing do_execve_file please note that
resurrecting?
> the code was buggy in several fundamental ways.
>
> - It did not ens
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 08:08:09AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Luis Chamberlain writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:35:25AM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:41:34AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> > Now that the last callser has been removed remove th
Luis Chamberlain writes:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:35:25AM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:41:34AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > Now that the last callser has been removed remove this code from exec.
>> >
>> > For anyone thinking of resurrecing do_execve_fi
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:35:25AM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:41:34AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Now that the last callser has been removed remove this code from exec.
> >
> > For anyone thinking of resurrecing do_execve_file please note that
> > the code
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:41:34AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Now that the last callser has been removed remove this code from exec.
>
> For anyone thinking of resurrecing do_execve_file please note that
> the code was buggy in several fundamental ways.
>
> - It did not ensure the file it
Now that the last callser has been removed remove this code from exec.
For anyone thinking of resurrecing do_execve_file please note that
the code was buggy in several fundamental ways.
- It did not ensure the file it was passed was read-only and that
deny_write_access had been called on it. W
6 matches
Mail list logo