On 10/21/2015 11:42 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 22 October 2015 at 05:35, Suman Anna wrote:
>
>>> Anyways I am OK too, if you guys want to fix it with a platform
>>> specific quirk. Let me know I'll pick this patch.
>>
>> I haven't gotten a chance to try #1, and I won't be able to look at it
>>
On 22 October 2015 at 05:35, Suman Anna wrote:
>> Anyways I am OK too, if you guys want to fix it with a platform
>> specific quirk. Let me know I'll pick this patch.
>
> I haven't gotten a chance to try #1, and I won't be able to look at it
> atleast for another month. I suggest that you go ah
Hi Jassi,
On 10/20/2015 11:44 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>> The mailbox framework controls the transmission queue and requires
>> either its controller implementations or clients to run the state
>> machine for the Tx queue. The OMAP mailbox contr
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> The mailbox framework controls the transmission queue and requires
> either its controller implementations or clients to run the state
> machine for the Tx queue. The OMAP mailbox controller uses a Tx-ready
> interrupt as the equivalent of a T
The mailbox framework controls the transmission queue and requires
either its controller implementations or clients to run the state
machine for the Tx queue. The OMAP mailbox controller uses a Tx-ready
interrupt as the equivalent of a Tx-done interrupt to run this Tx
queue state-machine.
The Wkup
5 matches
Mail list logo
