Am 01.12.20 um 15:43 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:51:37AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
@Jonathan: thx for getting the ball rolling again!
We could also, if we saw fit, take the position that anything that has
been processed through the docs build is a derived product
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:51:37AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> We could also, if we saw fit, take the position that anything that has
> been processed through the docs build is a derived product of the kernel
> and must be GPL-licensed - any dual-licensing would be stripped by that
> act. That
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:11:09 +
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > That's why I came up with the thought "make the text available under more
> > liberal license in addition to the GPLv2 is a good idea here". I considered
> > MIT, but from what I see CC-BY 4.0 is a way better choice for documentation
>
Am 24.11.20 um 10:36 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:31:33AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Am 24.11.20 um 10:18 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
For context: Patch 2 of this series adds a text to the Documenta
Am 24.11.20 um 13:11 schrieb Matthew Wilcox:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:07:41AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
There is nothing special with this text, it's just that GPL is known to not
be really ideal for documentation. That makes it hard for people to reuse
parts of the docs outside of the k
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:07:41AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> There is nothing special with this text, it's just that GPL is known to not
> be really ideal for documentation. That makes it hard for people to reuse
> parts of the docs outside of the kernel context, say in books or on
> websit
Am 24.11.20 um 10:36 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:31:33AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Am 24.11.20 um 10:18 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
For context: Patch 2 of this series adds a text to the Documenta
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:31:33AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am 24.11.20 um 10:18 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> For context: Patch 2 of this series adds a text to the Documentation/
>>> directory
>>> which (for now) use
Am 24.11.20 um 10:18 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
For context: Patch 2 of this series adds a text to the Documentation/ directory
which (for now) uses "GPL-2.0+ OR CC-BY-4.0", as I want to make it easy and
attractive for others to
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> For context: Patch 2 of this series adds a text to the Documentation/
> directory
> which (for now) uses "GPL-2.0+ OR CC-BY-4.0", as I want to make it easy and
> attractive for others to base their work on it. I'm not strongly at
Add the full text of the CC-BY-4.0 license to the kernel tree as well as
the required tags for reference and tooling.
The license text was copied directly from this url, but a 'Creative
Commons' was added before 'Attribution 4.0 International' in the first
line:
https://creativecommons.org/licens
11 matches
Mail list logo
