Prasad,
psoda...@codeaurora.org writes:
> On 2020-05-13 13:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> psoda...@codeaurora.org writes:
>>> It is not clear to me how to avoid #ifdef's in this case. Could you
>>> please share an example here?
>>
>> The answer is further down already:
>
> I think, you are referri
On 2020-05-13 13:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
psoda...@codeaurora.org writes:
On 2020-05-06 06:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+struct timer_base timer_base_deferrable;
unsigned int sysctl_timer_migration = 1;
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(timers_migration_enabled);
@@ -841,8 +842,14 @
psoda...@codeaurora.org writes:
> On 2020-05-06 06:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>>> +struct timer_base timer_base_deferrable;
>>> unsigned int sysctl_timer_migration = 1;
>>>
>>> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(timers_migration_enabled);
>>> @@ -841,8 +842,14 @@ static inline struct
Hi Tglx,
On 2020-05-06 06:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Prasad Sodagudi writes:
To make all cpu unbound deferrable timers are scalable, introduce a
common
timer base which is only for cpu unbound deferrable timers to make
those
are indeed cpu unbound so that can be scheduled by any of non idle
Prasad Sodagudi writes:
> To make all cpu unbound deferrable timers are scalable, introduce a common
> timer base which is only for cpu unbound deferrable timers to make those
> are indeed cpu unbound so that can be scheduled by any of non idle cpus.
> This common timer fixes scalability issue of
Hi Prasad,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/timers/core]
[also build test ERROR on tip/auto-latest tip/timers/nohz v5.7-rc4
next-20200504]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we al
Hi Prasad,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/timers/core]
[also build test ERROR on tip/auto-latest tip/timers/nohz v5.7-rc4
next-20200501]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we al
From: Joonwoo Park
When a deferrable work (INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK, etc.) is queued via
queue_delayed_work() it's probably intended to run the work item on any
CPU that isn't idle. However, we queue the work to run at a later time
by starting a deferrable timer that binds to whatever CPU the work is
8 matches
Mail list logo
