On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jiang Qiu wrote:
> - node = dev->of_node;
> - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_GPIO) || !node)
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_GPIO) || !(dev->of_node))
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
So, since you converted to fwnode
在 2016/2/25 21:43, Andy Shevchenko 写道:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Jiang Qiu wrote:
>> 在 2016/2/24 21:46, Andy Shevchenko 写道:
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:33 PM, qiujiang wrote:
>
>>> - why do you use fwnode_*() instead of device_property_*() calls?
>>> What prevents us to move to devic
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Jiang Qiu wrote:
> 在 2016/2/24 21:46, Andy Shevchenko 写道:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:33 PM, qiujiang wrote:
>> - why do you use fwnode_*() instead of device_property_*() calls?
>> What prevents us to move to device property API directly?
> Yes, it looks more r
在 2016/2/24 21:46, Andy Shevchenko 写道:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:33 PM, qiujiang wrote:
>> This patch switch device node to fwnode in dwapb_port_property,
>> so as to apply a unified data structure for DT and ACPI.
>>
>> This change also needs to be done in intel_quark_i2c_gpio driver,
>> since
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:33 PM, qiujiang wrote:
> This patch switch device node to fwnode in dwapb_port_property,
> so as to apply a unified data structure for DT and ACPI.
>
> This change also needs to be done in intel_quark_i2c_gpio driver,
> since it depends on gpio-dwapb driver.
>
> Acked-by:
This patch switch device node to fwnode in dwapb_port_property,
so as to apply a unified data structure for DT and ACPI.
This change also needs to be done in intel_quark_i2c_gpio driver,
since it depends on gpio-dwapb driver.
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg
Signed-off-by: qiujiang
---
drivers/gpio/g
6 matches
Mail list logo
