Quoting Nixiaoming (2019-04-24 08:31:23)
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:52 AM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >Quoting nixiaoming (2019-03-30 06:54:50)
> >> In the function divider_recalc_rate() The judgment of the return value of
> >> _get_div() indicates that the return value of _get_div() can be 0.
> >
> >W
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:52 AM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>Quoting nixiaoming (2019-03-30 06:54:50)
>> In the function divider_recalc_rate() The judgment of the return value of
>> _get_div() indicates that the return value of _get_div() can be 0.
>
>When does _get_div() return 0? It can't be CLK_DIVIDER
Quoting nixiaoming (2019-03-30 06:54:50)
> In the function divider_recalc_rate() The judgment of the return value of
> _get_div() indicates that the return value of _get_div() can be 0.
When does _get_div() return 0? It can't be CLK_DIVIDER_MAX_AT_ZERO or
CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO. I suppose it cou
In the function divider_recalc_rate() The judgment of the return value of
_get_div() indicates that the return value of _get_div() can be 0.
In order to avoid the divide-by-zero error, add check for return value
of _get_div() in the divider_ro_round_rate_parent()
Signed-off-by: nixiaoming
Reviewe
4 matches
Mail list logo
