On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 08:12 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 05 Jan 2018 20:41:41 +0100
> Knut Omang escreveu:
>
> > On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 16:08 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Em Thu, 04 Jan 2018 21:15:31 +0100
> > > Knut Omang escreveu:
> > >
> > > > > I'm surprised t
On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 13:03 +0100, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> Knut,
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Jani Nikula
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 17:50 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang wrote:
> >>> > Add scripts/
Knut,
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang wrote:
>> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 17:50 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang wrote:
>>> > Add scripts/runchecks which has generic support for running
>>> > checker tools in a conven
Em Fri, 05 Jan 2018 20:41:41 +0100
Knut Omang escreveu:
> On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 16:08 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Thu, 04 Jan 2018 21:15:31 +0100
> > Knut Omang escreveu:
> >
> > > > I'm surprised the commit message and the provided documentation say
> > > > nothing about using
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 16:08 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Thu, 04 Jan 2018 21:15:31 +0100
> Knut Omang escreveu:
>
> > > I'm surprised the commit message and the provided documentation say
> > > nothing about using CHECK=foo on the command line. That already supports
> > > arbitrary ch
Em Thu, 04 Jan 2018 21:15:31 +0100
Knut Omang escreveu:
> > I'm surprised the commit message and the provided documentation say
> > nothing about using CHECK=foo on the command line. That already supports
> > arbitrary checkers.
>
> The problem, highlighted by Jim Davis in
>
> https://lkml.o
> Am 05.01.2018 um 15:30 schrieb Jani Nikula :
>
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang wrote:
>> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 17:50 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
[...]
>> Hmm - I have been burnt by the use of unstable interfaces in Python before,
>> when I needed it to work on a (Linux) system with Python v.
On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 17:50 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang wrote:
>> > Add scripts/runchecks which has generic support for running
>> > checker tools in a convenient and user friendly way that
>> > the author hopes can contrib
On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 17:50 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang wrote:
> > Add scripts/runchecks which has generic support for running
> > checker tools in a convenient and user friendly way that
> > the author hopes can contribute to rein in issues detected
> > by these to
On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang wrote:
> Add scripts/runchecks which has generic support for running
> checker tools in a convenient and user friendly way that
> the author hopes can contribute to rein in issues detected
> by these tools in a manageable and convenient way.
>
> scripts/runchecks pr
Add scripts/runchecks which has generic support for running
checker tools in a convenient and user friendly way that
the author hopes can contribute to rein in issues detected
by these tools in a manageable and convenient way.
scripts/runchecks provides the following basic functionality:
* Makes
11 matches
Mail list logo