Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, October 04, 2014 12:59:59 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 04 October 2014 02:13:23 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Because people get the format wrong regardless of documentation. The > > > format: > > > > > > Package () { > > > Package () { ^ref1, data, data }, > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, October 04, 2014 12:56:21 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 04 October 2014 01:58:30 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, October 03, 2014 05:02:13 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Friday 03 October 2014 14:56:10 Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:55:56PM +01

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-04 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 04 October 2014 02:13:23 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Because people get the format wrong regardless of documentation. The > > format: > > > > Package () { > > Package () { ^ref1, data, data }, > > Package () { ^ref2, data }, > > Package () { ^ref3, data, data, data }

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-04 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 04 October 2014 01:58:30 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, October 03, 2014 05:02:13 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 03 October 2014 14:56:10 Mark Rutland wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:55:56PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > I'd certainly not like to see #foo-cells

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, October 03, 2014 02:48:49 PM Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:15:08PM +0100, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:51:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Thursday 02 October 2014 13:41:23 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:59:1

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, October 03, 2014 03:35:47 PM Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:38:49PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, October 03, 2014 02:58:26 PM Mark Rutland wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:03:51AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Thursday, October 02,

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, October 03, 2014 05:02:13 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 03 October 2014 14:56:10 Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:55:56PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Thursday 02 October 2014 17:38:09 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:29:03PM +0200

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 03 October 2014 14:56:10 Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:55:56PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 02 October 2014 17:38:09 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:29:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > Is this a limitation in the way that t

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-03 Thread Mark Rutland
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:38:49PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, October 03, 2014 02:58:26 PM Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:03:51AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Thursday, October 02, 2014 04:36:54 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, October 03, 2014 02:58:26 PM Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:03:51AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, October 02, 2014 04:36:54 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:46:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Thursday 02 October 2

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-03 Thread Mark Rutland
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:03:51AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, October 02, 2014 04:36:54 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:46:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Thursday 02 October 2014 15:15:08 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > [cut] > > > > > Putting e

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-03 Thread Mark Rutland
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:55:56PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 02 October 2014 17:38:09 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:29:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Is this a limitation in the way that the AML syntax and compiler works, > > > or is this a decision y

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-03 Thread Mark Rutland
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:15:08PM +0100, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:51:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 02 October 2014 13:41:23 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:59:14AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 01 October 2014

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-03 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 04:03:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, October 02, 2014 04:36:54 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:46:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Thursday 02 October 2014 15:15:08 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > [cut] > > > > > Putting e

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, October 02, 2014 04:36:54 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:46:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 02 October 2014 15:15:08 Mika Westerberg wrote: [cut] > > Putting everything to a single package results this: > > Package () { "pwms",

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 02 October 2014 17:38:09 Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:29:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Is this a limitation in the way that the AML syntax and compiler works, > > or is this a decision you made specifically for the _DSD syntax and that > > could still be ch

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-02 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:29:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Is this a limitation in the way that the AML syntax and compiler works, > or is this a decision you made specifically for the _DSD syntax and that > could still be changed if there is an overwhelming interest? It is only limitation o

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 02 October 2014 16:36:54 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > Even if you want to do automatic translation between DT and ACPI, > > I think it would be possible to treat these two the same: > > > > (forgive any syntax errors) > > > > Name (_DSD, Package () { > > ToUUID("d

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-02 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:46:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 02 October 2014 15:15:08 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > I thought when we had discussed the subsystem specific bindings, the > > > consensus there was to have subsystem specific accessors and > > > properties/tables. > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 02 October 2014 15:15:08 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > I thought when we had discussed the subsystem specific bindings, the > > consensus there was to have subsystem specific accessors and > > properties/tables. > > > > I would argue that for everything that ACPI already has (interrupts,

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-02 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:51:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 02 October 2014 13:41:23 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:59:14AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Wednesday 01 October 2014 04:11:20 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > From: Mika Westerberg > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 02 October 2014 13:41:23 Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:59:14AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 October 2014 04:11:20 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Mika Westerberg > > > > +The referenced ACPI device is returned in args->adev if found. > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-02 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:59:14AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 01 October 2014 04:11:20 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Mika Westerberg > > > > This document describes the data format and interfaces of ACPI device > > specific properties. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg

Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-10-01 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 01 October 2014 04:11:20 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Mika Westerberg > > This document describes the data format and interfaces of ACPI device > specific properties. > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg > Signed-off-by: Darren Hart > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Overall l

[PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-09-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Mika Westerberg This document describes the data format and interfaces of ACPI device specific properties. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg Signed-off-by: Darren Hart Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- Documentation/acpi/properties.txt | 410 ++ 1 fi