On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 12:12:01PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 11:04:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 07:44:33AM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > > +Sequence counters (:c:type:`seqcount_t`)
> > > +
>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 11:04:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 07:44:33AM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > +Sequence counters (:c:type:`seqcount_t`)
> > +
>
> > +.. code-block:: c
>
> I so hate RST, of course it's C. Also, ISTR Jo
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 11:04:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 07:44:33AM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > +Sequence counters (:c:type:`seqcount_t`)
> > +
>
> > +.. code-block:: c
>
> I so hate RST, of course it's C. Also, ISTR
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 23:04:39 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 07:44:33AM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > +Sequence counters (:c:type:`seqcount_t`)
> > +
>
> > +.. code-block:: c
>
> I so hate RST, of course it's C. Also, ISTR Jo
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 07:44:33AM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> +Sequence counters (:c:type:`seqcount_t`)
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
I so hate RST, of course it's C. Also, ISTR Jon saying you can leave
that all out without issue.
Proper documentation for the design and usage of sequence counters and
sequential locks does not exist. Complete the seqlock.h documentation as
follows:
- Divide all documentation on a seqcount_t vs. seqlock_t basis. The
description for both mechanisms was intermingled, which is incorrect
6 matches
Mail list logo
