I actually found someone locally who signed my key.
Good luck!
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 07:24:34PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 January 2013 02:14 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Vineet,
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:40:24 +0530 Vineet Gupta
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Stephen,
On Wednesday 30 January 2013 02:14 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:40:24 +0530 Vineet Gupta
> wrote:
>>
>> Stephen, can you please add the following branch (rebased off 3.8-rc5) to
>> linux-next
>>
>> git://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/linu
Hi Vineet,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:44:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:40:24 +0530 Vineet Gupta
> wrote:
> >
> > Stephen, can you please add the following branch (rebased off 3.8-rc5) to
> > linux-next
> >
> > git://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/li
Hi Vineet,
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:40:24 +0530 Vineet Gupta
wrote:
>
> Stephen, can you please add the following branch (rebased off 3.8-rc5) to
> linux-next
>
> git://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/linux.git arc-next
Added from today (though there may not be a linux-next rel
Hi Stephen,
On Monday 28 January 2013 12:40 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Hi Arnd / Stephen,
>
> On Saturday 26 January 2013 05:55 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I'd suggest that you both ask Stephen to add the trees to linux-next
>> now (I thought you had done that already, but I don't see them there
Hi Vineet
On 28/01/13 07:10, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> You don't need Acked-by statements on every single patch, but having
>> more of those is certainly benefitial. When it comes to the merge
>> window, please send a pull request to Linus, and keep me on Cc,
>> so I can weigh in with an additional A
Hi Arnd / Stephen,
On Saturday 26 January 2013 05:55 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2013, James Hogan wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> On 10/01/13 15:30, James Hogan wrote:
>>> This patchset adds core architecture support to Linux for Imagination's
>>> Meta ATP (Meta 1) and HTP (Meta 2) p
Hi Arnd,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:25:09AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2013, James Hogan wrote:
> > Review seems to have gone quiet. I'm fairly happy with this core
> > patchset in it's currently form (only trivial alterations required since
> > the v3 patches, e.g. some re
On Friday 25 January 2013, James Hogan wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 10/01/13 15:30, James Hogan wrote:
> > This patchset adds core architecture support to Linux for Imagination's
> > Meta ATP (Meta 1) and HTP (Meta 2) processor cores. Most of the feedback
> > from the RFC and v2 patchsets has now been
Hi Arnd,
On 10/01/13 15:30, James Hogan wrote:
> This patchset adds core architecture support to Linux for Imagination's
> Meta ATP (Meta 1) and HTP (Meta 2) processor cores. Most of the feedback
> from the RFC and v2 patchsets has now been addressed. All further
> feedback is most welcome.
>
> T
On 19/01/13 05:55, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 09:55:07AM +, James Hogan wrote:
>> Hi Stephen, Al,
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 + James Hogan
>>> wrote:
Okay, I've rebased the metag tree fro
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 09:55:07AM +, James Hogan wrote:
> Hi Stephen, Al,
>
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 + James Hogan
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch
Hi James,
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 09:55:07 + James Hogan wrote:
>
> Would "sufficiently ready" normally mean "in a state ready to send a
> pull request to Linus"?
That is the usual criteria.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
pgp9Q9GPvSzrc.pgp
Description: P
Hi Stephen, Al,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 + James Hogan wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch
> > of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and
> > GENER
Hi James,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 + James Hogan wrote:
>
> Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch
> of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and
> GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal).
OK, but I hope you mentioned not rebasing to
Hi,
On 11/01/13 13:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 + James Hogan wrote:
>>
>> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
>>> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (
Hi Stephen,
On 11/01/13 13:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 + James Hogan wrote:
>>
>> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
>>> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus
Hi James,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 + James Hogan wrote:
>
> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
> > can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or some
> > other tree that does not reba
On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or some
> other tree that does not rebase). Its OK to test by doing a merge with
> linux-next ...
Thanks for the
Hi James,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:30:28 + James Hogan wrote:
>
> This patchset adds core architecture support to Linux for Imagination's
> Meta ATP (Meta 1) and HTP (Meta 2) processor cores. Most of the feedback
> from the RFC and v2 patchsets has now been addressed. All further
> feedback is
This patchset adds core architecture support to Linux for Imagination's
Meta ATP (Meta 1) and HTP (Meta 2) processor cores. Most of the feedback
from the RFC and v2 patchsets has now been addressed. All further
feedback is most welcome.
The patches are based on next-20130110, and can also be found
21 matches
Mail list logo
