Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port

2012-09-12 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 12:25:37AM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:26:35PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for > > the 64-bit ARM architecture. Most of the review comments for the > > previous release h

Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port

2012-09-12 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 10 September 2012, Jon Masters wrote: > On 09/07/2012 12:26 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for > > the 64-bit ARM architecture. > > > > ...but the main goal was to freeze the user ABI. > > Is the consensus now that we

Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port

2012-09-10 Thread Jon Masters
On 09/07/2012 12:26 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for the 64-bit ARM architecture. ...but the main goal was to freeze the user ABI. Is the consensus now that we're good from an ABI viewpoint? Jon. -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port

2012-09-10 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote: > This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for > the 64-bit ARM architecture. Most of the review comments for the > previous release have been implemented. There are a few left (like > generic timer dts specification) but the m

Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port

2012-09-08 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >> Mostly I was looking at the series from SOC boot and CPU PM >> point of view and boot part seems to just fine. >> >> As per discussion at LPC, I have gone through the SMC >> proposal which ARM

Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port

2012-09-08 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Mostly I was looking at the series from SOC boot and CPU PM > point of view and boot part seems to just fine. > > As per discussion at LPC, I have gone through the SMC > proposal which ARM has published. In general the boot part > with SMC seems to b

Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port

2012-09-08 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Catalin, On Friday 07 September 2012 09:56 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for the 64-bit ARM architecture. Most of the review comments for the previous release have been implemented. There are a few left (like generic timer dts spe

Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port

2012-09-07 Thread Olof Johansson
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:26:35PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for > the 64-bit ARM architecture. Most of the review comments for the > previous release have been implemented. There are a few left (like > generic timer dts spe

[PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port

2012-09-07 Thread Catalin Marinas
This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for the 64-bit ARM architecture. Most of the review comments for the previous release have been implemented. There are a few left (like generic timer dts specification) but the main goal was to freeze the user ABI. The Linux kern