On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:48:00PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:15:16 +0100, Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:31:16AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:37:39 +0100, Catalin Marinas
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 0
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:15:16 +0100, Catalin Marinas
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:31:16AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:37:39 +0100, Catalin Marinas
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > Regarding the requests to ref
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:31:16AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:37:39 +0100, Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > Regarding the requests to refactor ACPICA to work better for ARM. I
> > > completely agree that it s
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:05:25 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:38 +0800, Hanjun Guo
> > wrote:
> >> ACPI 5.1 has been released and now be freely available for
> >> download [1]. It fixed some major gaps to run ACPI
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:37:39 +0100, Catalin Marinas
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Regarding the requests to refactor ACPICA to work better for ARM. I
> > completely agree that it should be done, but I do not think it should be
> > a prerequisite to get
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:49:22 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:38 +0800, Hanjun Guo
> > wrote:
> > > ACPI 5.1 has been released and now be freely available for
> > > download [1]. It fixed some m
On 09/12/2014 05:38 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 09/11/2014 09:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:38 +0800, Hanjun Guo
>>> wrote:
ACPI 5.1 has been released and now be freely available for
>>
On 09/11/2014 09:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:38 +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> ACPI 5.1 has been released and now be freely available for
>>> download [1]. It fixed some major gaps to run ACPI o
On 11/09/14 17:06, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:57:24PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
[...]
This what we have suggested in past especially for this S-state support.
Currently the core acpi code compiles in sleep support unconditionally.
That doesn't mean we need to do the
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:57:24PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 11/09/14 16:37, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> >>Regarding the requests to refactor ACPICA to work better for ARM. I
> >>completely agree that it should be done, but I
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:38 +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> ACPI 5.1 has been released and now be freely available for
>> download [1]. It fixed some major gaps to run ACPI on ARM,
>> this patch just follow the ACPI 5.1 spec and prepare the
>> c
On 11/09/14 16:37, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
Regarding the requests to refactor ACPICA to work better for ARM. I
completely agree that it should be done, but I do not think it should be
a prerequisite to getting this core support merge
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> Regarding the requests to refactor ACPICA to work better for ARM. I
> completely agree that it should be done, but I do not think it should be
> a prerequisite to getting this core support merged. That kind of
> refactoring is far easi
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 11, 2014 02:29:34 PM Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:38 +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> > ACPI 5.1 has been released and now be freely available for
>> > download [1]. It fixed some major gaps to run A
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 02:29:34 PM Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:38 +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > ACPI 5.1 has been released and now be freely available for
> > download [1]. It fixed some major gaps to run ACPI on ARM,
> > this patch just follow the ACPI 5.1 spec and pre
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:38 +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > ACPI 5.1 has been released and now be freely available for
> > download [1]. It fixed some major gaps to run ACPI on ARM,
> > this patch just follow the ACPI 5.1 spe
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:38 +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> ACPI 5.1 has been released and now be freely available for
> download [1]. It fixed some major gaps to run ACPI on ARM,
> this patch just follow the ACPI 5.1 spec and prepare the
> code to run ACPI on ARM64.
>
> ACPI 5.1 has some major chang
ACPI 5.1 has been released and now be freely available for
download [1]. It fixed some major gaps to run ACPI on ARM,
this patch just follow the ACPI 5.1 spec and prepare the
code to run ACPI on ARM64.
ACPI 5.1 has some major changes for the following tables and
method which are essential for ARM
18 matches
Mail list logo
