Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] String hash improvements

2016-05-28 Thread George Spelvin
Oh! I based in on 0fed3ac866eabf01924457921ee3684c8e4c9005, which I hope makes sense.

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] String hash improvements

2016-05-28 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:57 PM, George Spelvin wrote: > Okay, Linus, it's still warm from the oven, but I think it's fully baked. Hmm. Whioch commit did you use as a base for this? It's not plain 4.6, but it's not toay's git either. I did find a point where this applies, but it would be even b

[PATCH v3 00/10] String hash improvements

2016-05-28 Thread George Spelvin
Okay, Linus, it's still warm from the oven, but I think it's fully baked. Special thanks to J. Bruce Fields for testing and finding bugs in v1. (I learned some humbling lessons about "obviously correct" code.) On the arch-specific front, the m68k assembly has been tested in a standalone test harn