Thanks for doing this, it's something I've been hoping someone would do
for a long time.
While I kinda wish we had performance data for each individual patch (at
least the behavior-changing ones), this does look like a good
improvement. That might, for instance, tell is a bit about how the
separa
[ Cover-letter is identical to v2, including benchmark results,
excluding the change log. ]
Currently, local and remote TLB flushes are not performed concurrently,
which introduces unnecessary overhead - each INVLPG can take 100s of
cycles. This patch-set allows TLB flushes to be run concurrent
2 matches
Mail list logo
