> I was thinking the same so I have tried to cherry-pick the patch on a 3.10.79
> and it didn't cause any conflicts so I thought it could be sent to stable as
> is.
OK, so reducing context seems to help. Thanks for checking!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:36:28AM +0900, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > If you send a new version, could you add stable in Cc to patch 3/6:
>
> No need to send a new version just because of an additional ack. I can
> apply that. However...
>
> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org #3.10 and later
> > If not,
> If you send a new version, could you add stable in Cc to patch 3/6:
No need to send a new version just because of an additional ack. I can
apply that. However...
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org #3.10 and later
> If not, Wolfram could you do it please?
The problem with 3/6 is that it seems to dep
Hi Cyrille,
For the whole serie:
Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches
If you send a new version, could you add stable in Cc to patch 3/6:
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org #3.10 and later
If not, Wolfram could you do it please?
Thanks
Ludovic
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 03:18:30PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>
ChangeLog
v3:
- fix braces {} coding style issue
- split the alternative command patch into 2 patches: the first one fixes
a race condition whereas the second one is the actual alternative command
patch
v2:
- fix typo in comment for AT91_TWI_SVEN.
- document new device tree bindings like "atm
5 matches
Mail list logo
