FYI, LEDE/OpenWRT is shipping this patchset now:
https://github.com/lede-project/source/commit/1708644f1915eb7587a904d81da0ef0b559d1567
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 03:15:35PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > According to Ralf, it's queued up for 4.11? Is that right?
>
> It's in -next:
>
> Part 1:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commi
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> According to Ralf, it's queued up for 4.11? Is that right?
It's in -next:
Part 1:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=fe8bd18ffea5327344d4ec2bf11f47951212abd0
Part 2:
https://git.kernel.org/cgi
Hi Greg,
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> How many patches is the irqstacks "feature" for MIPS? What kernel was
> it released in? Have any git commit ids I can look at?
According to Ralf, it's queued up for 4.11? Is that right?
Part 1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 02:39:49PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:49 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> > Its quite a significant change/feature, especially in terms of potential
> > for further breakage. I don't think its really stable material to be
> > honest
Hi James,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:49 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> Its quite a significant change/feature, especially in terms of potential
> for further breakage. I don't think its really stable material to be
> honest. It sounds bad if the kernel stack requirement can be made
> arbitrarily large
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:32:52AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:32:38AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >
> >> Was this ever picked up for 4.10 or 4.11?
> >
> > Still sitting in -next as commit 3cc3434fd63
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:32:38AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
>> Was this ever picked up for 4.10 or 4.11?
>
> Still sitting in -next as commit 3cc3434fd630 and its four parent commits.
Oh, good, so it's progressing normally. I just d
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:32:38AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Was this ever picked up for 4.10 or 4.11?
Still sitting in -next as commit 3cc3434fd630 and its four parent commits.
Ralf
Was this ever picked up for 4.10 or 4.11?
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the v3. For the whole series:
Acked-by: Jason A. Donenfeld
Jason
This series adds a separate stack for each CPU wihin the system to use
when handling IRQs. Previously IRQs were handled on the kernel stack of
the current task. If that task was deep down a call stack at the point
of the interrupt, and handling the interrupt required a deep IRQ stack,
then there w
12 matches
Mail list logo