Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: at91: fix irq_pm_install_action WARNING

2015-01-24 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Thomas, On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 17:37:48 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > - change the compatible string to clearly show that this chip is purely > >virtual > > So we probably want to do : s/dumb/virt/ for both DT and code to make > it cle

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: at91: fix irq_pm_install_action WARNING

2015-01-24 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote: > - change the compatible string to clearly show that this chip is purely >virtual So we probably want to do : s/dumb/virt/ for both DT and code to make it clear from the names as well. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send t

[PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: at91: fix irq_pm_install_action WARNING

2015-01-23 Thread Boris Brezillon
Commit cab303be91dc47942bc25de33dc1140123540800 [1] introduced a WARN_ON test which triggers a WARNING backtrace on at91 platforms. While this WARN_ON is absolutely necessary to warn users that they should not mix request with and without IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags on shared IRQs, there is no easy way t