On Wed 2020-05-20 20:43:33, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/05/15 18:02), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Wed 2020-04-15 20:00:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct
> > > rtc_time.
> > > We have few users of time64_t that would like to pri
On (20/05/15 18:02), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2020-04-15 20:00:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct rtc_time.
> > We have few users of time64_t that would like to print it.
>
> It seems that everything was explained and the patches lo
On Wed 2020-04-15 20:00:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct rtc_time.
> We have few users of time64_t that would like to print it.
It seems that everything was explained and the patches look good to
me. If we allowed %ptR then it makes se
3 matches
Mail list logo
