Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Use blocked_lock_lock only to protect blocked_hash

2015-03-26 Thread Daniel Wagner
>> - I also played with lockdep detection. With lglock-v0 applied >>some tests like flock02 and posix02 get considerable worse >>results. The difference between flock01 and flock02 is that >>the children of flock01 fight over one file lock versus >>the children of flock02 lock and

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Use blocked_lock_lock only to protect blocked_hash

2015-03-26 Thread Jeff Layton
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:11:19 +0100 Daniel Wagner wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Sorry for the long delay. Was I week on holiday and the testing > took a bit longer than I expected. > > On 03/14/2015 01:40 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:20:24 +0100 > > Daniel Wagner wrote: > >> On 03/

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Use blocked_lock_lock only to protect blocked_hash

2015-03-26 Thread Daniel Wagner
Hi Jeff, Sorry for the long delay. Was I week on holiday and the testing took a bit longer than I expected. On 03/14/2015 01:40 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:20:24 +0100 > Daniel Wagner wrote: >> On 03/07/2015 03:00 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: >>> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 08:53:30 +0100

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Use blocked_lock_lock only to protect blocked_hash

2015-03-14 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:20:24 +0100 Daniel Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/07/2015 03:00 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 08:53:30 +0100 > > Daniel Wagner wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Finally, I got a bigger machine and did a quick test round. I expected > >> to see some improvemen

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Use blocked_lock_lock only to protect blocked_hash

2015-03-10 Thread Daniel Wagner
Hi, On 03/07/2015 03:00 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 08:53:30 +0100 > Daniel Wagner wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Finally, I got a bigger machine and did a quick test round. I expected >> to see some improvements but the resutls do not show any real gain. So >> they are merely refactorin

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Use blocked_lock_lock only to protect blocked_hash

2015-03-07 Thread Jeff Layton
On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 09:00:41 -0500 Jeff Layton wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 08:53:30 +0100 > Daniel Wagner wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Finally, I got a bigger machine and did a quick test round. I expected > > to see some improvements but the resutls do not show any real gain. So > > they are mere

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Use blocked_lock_lock only to protect blocked_hash

2015-03-07 Thread Jeff Layton
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 08:53:30 +0100 Daniel Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > Finally, I got a bigger machine and did a quick test round. I expected > to see some improvements but the resutls do not show any real gain. So > they are merely refactoring patches. > Ok, in that case is there any point in merg

[PATCH v3 0/2] Use blocked_lock_lock only to protect blocked_hash

2015-03-05 Thread Daniel Wagner
Hi, Finally, I got a bigger machine and did a quick test round. I expected to see some improvements but the resutls do not show any real gain. So they are merely refactoring patches. 4x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4610 v2 @ 2.30GHz 4.0.0-rc2/flock01.data # NumSamples = 3; Min = 47160.80; Max = 47555