On 2016/5/23 23:20, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2016 11:45:34 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
On 2016/5/20 6:33, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:20:51 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because
On Mon, 23 May 2016 11:45:34 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
> On 2016/5/20 6:33, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:20:51 +0800
> > Yongji Xie wrote:
> >
> >> Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
> >> sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio
> >> pa
On 2016/5/20 6:33, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:20:51 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio
page may be shared with other BARs. This will cause some
performance issues when we pa
On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:20:51 +0800
Yongji Xie wrote:
> Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
> sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio
> page may be shared with other BARs. This will cause some
> performance issues when we passthrough a PCI device with
> this kin
Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio
page may be shared with other BARs. This will cause some
performance issues when we passthrough a PCI device with
this kind of BARs. Guest will be not able to handle the mmio
accesses to
5 matches
Mail list logo