On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 06:04:27PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Hi
>
> This would need Tested-by's. I've tested it both PTT/fTPM based system
> and dTPM (2.0) based system. Thank you.
I'm on the road at the moment, but I'll be able to test this next week.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam
Hi
This would need Tested-by's. I've tested it both PTT/fTPM based system
and dTPM (2.0) based system. Thank you.
/Jarkko
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:19:28PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
> MSFT0101. They can be differentiated
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:19:28PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
> MSFT0101. They can be differentiated by looking at the start method from
> TPM2 ACPI table. This patches makes necessary fixes to tpm_tis and
> tpm_crb modules in
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 18:19 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
> MSFT0101. They can be differentiated by looking at the start method
> from
> TPM2 ACPI table. This patches makes necessary fixes to tpm_tis and
> tpm_crb modules in orde
Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
MSFT0101. They can be differentiated by looking at the start method from
TPM2 ACPI table. This patches makes necessary fixes to tpm_tis and
tpm_crb modules in order to correctly detect, which module should be
used.
For MSFT0101 we
5 matches
Mail list logo
