Ping Ingo, ;-)
On 8/28/15 9:29 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 02:55:56PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
This patch fix it by following the rules for changing task_struct::cpus_allowed
w/ both pi_lock and rq->lock are held.
Thanks, I made that the below. There was a pin leak and I t
On 8/28/15 9:29 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 02:55:56PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
This patch fix it by following the rules for changing task_struct::cpus_allowed
w/ both pi_lock and rq->lock are held.
Thanks, I made that the below. There was a pin leak and I turned the
safet
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 02:55:56PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> This patch fix it by following the rules for changing
> task_struct::cpus_allowed
> w/ both pi_lock and rq->lock are held.
Thanks, I made that the below. There was a pin leak and I turned the
safety check into a WARN_ON because it rea
[ cut here ]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13 at kernel/sched/core.c:1156
do_set_cpus_allowed+0x7e/0x80()
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 13 Comm: migration/0 Not tainted 4.2.0-rc1-00049-g25834c7 #2
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x4b/0x75
warn_slowpath_common+0x8b/0xc0
4 matches
Mail list logo