On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:54:37 -0700, Tony Ambardar wrote:
> A few archs like powerpc have different errno.h values for macros
> EDEADLOCK and EDEADLK. In code including both libc and linux versions of
> errno.h, this can result in multiple definitions of EDEADLOCK in the
> include chain. Definitions
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 03:41, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Tony Ambardar writes:
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > The latest version of this patch addressed all feedback I'm aware of
> > when submitted last September, and I've seen no further comments from
> > reviewers since then.
> >
> > Could you ple
Tony Ambardar writes:
> Hello Michael,
>
> The latest version of this patch addressed all feedback I'm aware of
> when submitted last September, and I've seen no further comments from
> reviewers since then.
>
> Could you please let me know where this stands and if anything further
> is needed?
S
Hello Michael,
The latest version of this patch addressed all feedback I'm aware of
when submitted last September, and I've seen no further comments from
reviewers since then.
Could you please let me know where this stands and if anything further
is needed?
Kind regards,
Tony
On Thu, 17 Sept 20
A few archs like powerpc have different errno.h values for macros
EDEADLOCK and EDEADLK. In code including both libc and linux versions of
errno.h, this can result in multiple definitions of EDEADLOCK in the
include chain. Definitions to the same value (e.g. seen with mips) do
not raise warnings, b
5 matches
Mail list logo
