On 12/10/2013 01:15 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
09.12.2013 21:10, Peter Hurley пишет:
On 12/09/2013 11:26 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
09.12.2013 18:50, Peter Hurley пишет:
if (found && read_buf(ldata, eol) == __DISABLED_CHAR) {
n--;
eof_push = !n && ldata->read_tail != ldata-
09.12.2013 21:10, Peter Hurley пишет:
On 12/09/2013 11:26 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
09.12.2013 18:50, Peter Hurley пишет:
if (found && read_buf(ldata, eol) == __DISABLED_CHAR) {
n--;
eof_push = !n && ldata->read_tail != ldata->line_start;
+ldata->push = 0;
On 12/09/2013 11:26 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
09.12.2013 18:50, Peter Hurley пишет:
if (found && read_buf(ldata, eol) == __DISABLED_CHAR) {
n--;
eof_push = !n && ldata->read_tail != ldata->line_start;
+ ldata->push = 0;
}
Will this wor
readline() inadvertently triggers an error recovery path when
pastes larger than 4k overrun the line discipline buffer. The
error recovery path discards input when the line discipline buffer
is full and operating in canonical mode and no newline has been
received. Because readline() changes the ter
4 matches
Mail list logo