On 12/23/2020 8:10 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>>
>> Michan, We would still need config option so that we can reduce the
>> memory consumption on low ram devices using config.
>>
>> Alex, On this,
>> "I also suppose device vendors may prefer setting a fixed (maybe
>> non-default) hash size fo
>
> Michan, We would still need config option so that we can reduce the
> memory consumption on low ram devices using config.
>
> Alex, On this,
> "I also suppose device vendors may prefer setting a fixed (maybe
> non-default) hash size for low-memory devices rather than letting the
> admins increa
On 12/22/2020 1:59 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 04:04:09PM +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:15 PM Vijayanand Jitta
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/18/2020 2:10 PM, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
On 12/17/2020 4:24 PM, Alexander Potapen
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 04:04:09PM +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:15 PM Vijayanand Jitta
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/18/2020 2:10 PM, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/17/2020 4:24 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > Can you provide an example
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:15 PM Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/18/2020 2:10 PM, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/17/2020 4:24 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> Can you provide an example of a use case in which the user wants to
> use the stack depot of a smaller size with
On 12/18/2020 2:10 PM, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/2020 4:24 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
Can you provide an example of a use case in which the user wants to
use the stack depot of a smaller size without disabling it completely,
and that size cannot be configured st
On 12/17/2020 4:24 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>>> Can you provide an example of a use case in which the user wants to
>>> use the stack depot of a smaller size without disabling it completely,
>>> and that size cannot be configured statically?
>>> As far as I understand, for the page owner e
> > Can you provide an example of a use case in which the user wants to
> > use the stack depot of a smaller size without disabling it completely,
> > and that size cannot be configured statically?
> > As far as I understand, for the page owner example you gave it's
> > sufficient to provide a swit
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:25 AM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:04 AM wrote:
> >
> > From: Yogesh Lal
> >
> > Add a kernel parameter stack_hash_order to configure STACK_HASH_SIZE.
> >
> > Aim is to have configurable value for STACK_HASH_SIZE, so that one
> > can configure it
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:04 AM wrote:
>
> From: Yogesh Lal
>
> Add a kernel parameter stack_hash_order to configure STACK_HASH_SIZE.
>
> Aim is to have configurable value for STACK_HASH_SIZE, so that one
> can configure it depending on usecase there by reducing the static
> memory overhead.
>
>
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 6:42 AM Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>
> On 12/16/2020 7:04 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> >>> To reiterate, I think you don't need a tunable stack_hash_order
> >>> parameter if the only use case is to disable the stack depot.
> >>> Maybe it is enough to just add a boolean fla
On 12/16/2020 7:04 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>>> To reiterate, I think you don't need a tunable stack_hash_order
>>> parameter if the only use case is to disable the stack depot.
>>> Maybe it is enough to just add a boolean flag?
>>
>> There are multiple users of stackdepot they might still
> > To reiterate, I think you don't need a tunable stack_hash_order
> > parameter if the only use case is to disable the stack depot.
> > Maybe it is enough to just add a boolean flag?
>
> There are multiple users of stackdepot they might still want to use
> stack depot but with a lower memory foot
On 12/16/2020 6:41 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:06 PM Vijayanand Jitta
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/16/2020 1:56 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 4:43 AM Vijayanand Jitta
>>> wrote:
On 12/14/2020 4:02 PM, Vijayanand Ji
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:06 PM Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/16/2020 1:56 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 4:43 AM Vijayanand Jitta
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/14/2020 4:02 PM, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 12/14/2020 3:04 PM, Alexander
On 12/16/2020 1:56 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 4:43 AM Vijayanand Jitta
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/14/2020 4:02 PM, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/14/2020 3:04 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:02 AM Vijayanand Jitta
wr
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 4:43 AM Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/14/2020 4:02 PM, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/14/2020 3:04 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:02 AM Vijayanand Jitta
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 12/11/2020 6:55 PM, Alexander
On 12/14/2020 4:02 PM, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>
>
> On 12/14/2020 3:04 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:02 AM Vijayanand Jitta
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/11/2020 6:55 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 1:45 PM Vijayanand Jitta
On 12/14/2020 3:04 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:02 AM Vijayanand Jitta
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/11/2020 6:55 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 1:45 PM Vijayanand Jitta
>>> wrote:
On 12/11/2020 2:06 PM, Alexander Pot
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:02 AM Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/11/2020 6:55 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 1:45 PM Vijayanand Jitta
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/11/2020 2:06 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:01 AM wrote:
>
On 12/11/2020 6:55 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 1:45 PM Vijayanand Jitta
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/11/2020 2:06 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:01 AM wrote:
From: Yogesh Lal
Add a kernel parameter stack_hash_order
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 1:45 PM Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/11/2020 2:06 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:01 AM wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Yogesh Lal
> >>
> >> Add a kernel parameter stack_hash_order to configure STACK_HASH_SIZE.
> >>
> >> Aim is to have configu
On 12/11/2020 2:06 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:01 AM wrote:
>>
>> From: Yogesh Lal
>>
>> Add a kernel parameter stack_hash_order to configure STACK_HASH_SIZE.
>>
>> Aim is to have configurable value for STACK_HASH_SIZE, so that one
>> can configure it depending o
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:01 AM wrote:
>
> From: Yogesh Lal
>
> Add a kernel parameter stack_hash_order to configure STACK_HASH_SIZE.
>
> Aim is to have configurable value for STACK_HASH_SIZE, so that one
> can configure it depending on usecase there by reducing the static
> memory overhead.
>
>
From: Yogesh Lal
Add a kernel parameter stack_hash_order to configure STACK_HASH_SIZE.
Aim is to have configurable value for STACK_HASH_SIZE, so that one
can configure it depending on usecase there by reducing the static
memory overhead.
One example is of Page Owner, default value of STACK_HASH
25 matches
Mail list logo
