Re: [PATCH v3] fuse: add support for copy_file_range()

2018-08-21 Thread Niels de Vos
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 02:02:35PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > There are several FUSE filesystems that can implement server-side copy > > or other efficient copy/duplication/clone methods. The copy_file_range() > > syscall is the standard

Re: [PATCH v3] fuse: add support for copy_file_range()

2018-08-07 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > There are several FUSE filesystems that can implement server-side copy > or other efficient copy/duplication/clone methods. The copy_file_range() > syscall is the standard interface that users have access to while not > depending on external l

Re: [PATCH v3] fuse: add support for copy_file_range()

2018-08-06 Thread Niels de Vos
Hi Miklos, On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:53:41PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > There are several FUSE filesystems that can implement server-side copy > or other efficient copy/duplication/clone methods. The copy_file_range() > syscall is the standard interface that users have access to while not > dep

[PATCH v3] fuse: add support for copy_file_range()

2018-06-29 Thread Niels de Vos
There are several FUSE filesystems that can implement server-side copy or other efficient copy/duplication/clone methods. The copy_file_range() syscall is the standard interface that users have access to while not depending on external libraries that bypass FUSE. Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos ---