Re: [PATCH v3] drivers: cpufreq: Mark function as static in cpufreq.c

2014-02-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 02:16:51 PM j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:56:45PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:12:42 PM Rashika Kheria wrote: > > > Mark function as static in cpufreq.c because it is not > > > used outside this fi

Re: [PATCH v3] drivers: cpufreq: Mark function as static in cpufreq.c

2014-02-26 Thread josh
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:56:45PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:12:42 PM Rashika Kheria wrote: > > Mark function as static in cpufreq.c because it is not > > used outside this file. > > > > This eliminates the following warning in cpufreq.c: > > drivers/cpuf

Re: [PATCH v3] drivers: cpufreq: Mark function as static in cpufreq.c

2014-02-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:12:42 PM Rashika Kheria wrote: > Mark function as static in cpufreq.c because it is not > used outside this file. > > This eliminates the following warning in cpufreq.c: > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:355:9: warning: no previous prototype for > ‘show_boost’ [-Wmiss

[PATCH v3] drivers: cpufreq: Mark function as static in cpufreq.c

2014-02-26 Thread Rashika Kheria
Mark function as static in cpufreq.c because it is not used outside this file. This eliminates the following warning in cpufreq.c: drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:355:9: warning: no previous prototype for ‘show_boost’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria --- Changes since v1: Incorrec