In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Morton writes:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:39:55 -0400
> Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This series of 4 proposed patches (take 3) changes fs/ioctl.c and Unionfs as
> > follows.
>
> The problem is of course that you need these in your tree for ongo
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:39:55 -0400
Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This series of 4 proposed patches (take 3) changes fs/ioctl.c and Unionfs as
> follows.
The problem is of course that you need these in your tree for ongoing
development, but 2.6.25 is months away. They look OK to me so I
This series of 4 proposed patches (take 3) changes fs/ioctl.c and Unionfs as
follows. This series is against v2.6.24-rc1-423-g97855b4.
Patch 1: just applies coding standards to fs/ioctl.c (while I'm at it, I
figured it's worth cleaning VFS files one at a time).
Patch 2: does two things:
(a) Re
3 matches
Mail list logo
