On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 19:18:16 -0800 menglong8.d...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Menglong Dong
>
> The bit mask for MSG_* seems a little confused here. Replace it
> with BIT() to make it clear to understand.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - use BIT() instead of BIT_MASK()
>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 7:52 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 6:32 AM wrote:
> >
> > From: Menglong Dong
> >
> > The bit mask for MSG_* seems a little confused here. Replace it
> > with BIT() to make it clear to understand.
>
> Now it's confusing which version maintainer shoul
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 6:32 AM wrote:
>
> From: Menglong Dong
>
> The bit mask for MSG_* seems a little confused here. Replace it
> with BIT() to make it clear to understand.
Now it's confusing which version maintainer should take (you forgot,
it seems twice, to bump the patch version and mentio
From: Menglong Dong
The bit mask for MSG_* seems a little confused here. Replace it
with BIT() to make it clear to understand.
Changes since v1:
- use BIT() instead of BIT_MASK()
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong
---
include/linux/socket.h | 71 ++
1 file ch
From: Menglong Dong
The bit mask for MSG_* seems a little confused here. Replace it
with BIT() to make it clear to understand.
Changes since v1:
- use BIT() instead of BIT_MASK()
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong
---
include/linux/socket.h | 71 ++
1 file ch
5 matches
Mail list logo