On 9/26/24 14:54, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 9/25/24 14:56, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
>>
>> I don't think this was a noise :) IMO some people want to see WARNING
>> during testing to catch errors,
>> but not for the slub_kunit test case. I think a proper approach here
>> would be suppressing
>> warnin
On 9/25/24 14:56, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 11:13 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>> On 9/21/24 23:16, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 6:25 AM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 9/21/24 23:08, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> >>> On 9/21/24 13:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 11:13 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> On 9/21/24 23:16, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 6:25 AM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/21/24 23:08, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>> On 9/21/24 13:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> +CC kunit folks
>
> On 9/20/
On 9/21/24 23:16, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 6:25 AM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 9/21/24 23:08, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 9/21/24 13:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
+CC kunit folks
On 9/20/24 15:35, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 12:31:20PM +0200, Vlastim
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 6:25 AM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> On 9/21/24 23:08, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 9/21/24 13:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> +CC kunit folks
> >>
> >> On 9/20/24 15:35, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 12:31:20PM +0200, Vlastimi
On 9/21/24 23:08, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/21/24 13:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> +CC kunit folks
>>
>> On 9/20/24 15:35, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 12:31:20PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Add a test that will create cache, allocate one object,
On 9/21/24 13:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
+CC kunit folks
On 9/20/24 15:35, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 12:31:20PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Add a test that will create cache, allocate one object, kfree_rcu() it
and attempt to destroy it. As long as the usage of
+CC kunit folks
On 9/20/24 15:35, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 12:31:20PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Add a test that will create cache, allocate one object, kfree_rcu() it
>> and attempt to destroy it. As long as the usage of kvfree_rcu_barrier()
>> in kmem_cach
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 12:31:20PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Add a test that will create cache, allocate one object, kfree_rcu() it
> and attempt to destroy it. As long as the usage of kvfree_rcu_barrier()
> in kmem_cache_destroy() works correctly, there should be no warnings in
> dmesg
On 9/14/24 15:22, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 7:31 PM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>
>> Add a test that will create cache, allocate one object, kfree_rcu() it
>> and attempt to destroy it. As long as the usage of kvfree_rcu_barrier()
>> in kmem_cache_destroy() works correctly, there s
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 7:31 PM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> Add a test that will create cache, allocate one object, kfree_rcu() it
> and attempt to destroy it. As long as the usage of kvfree_rcu_barrier()
> in kmem_cache_destroy() works correctly, there should be no warnings in
> dmesg and the test
11 matches
Mail list logo