On 2/13/25 3:32 AM, Li Wang wrote:
Hi John,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 6:31 AM John Hubbard mailto:jhubb...@nvidia.com>> wrote:
On 2/12/25 12:34 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 6/13/24 19:30, John Hubbard wrote:
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
On 2/13/25 00:04, John Hubbard wrote:
>
> 2) I'm unable to reproduce what you saw, because in ALL cases (before
> or after the commit, and with or without a revert), I get the same
> results on my Intel test machine:
>
> $ ./protection_keys_64
> has pkeys: 0
> running PKEY tests for u
On 2/12/25 12:34 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
Hi John,
On 6/13/24 19:30, John Hubbard wrote:
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
-#include
+#include
#include
#include
I'm
On 2/12/25 12:34 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
Hi John,
On 6/13/24 19:30, John Hubbard wrote:
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
-#include
+#include
#include
#include
I'm
Hi John,
On 6/13/24 19:30, John Hubbard wrote:
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> -#include
> +#include
> #include
> #include
I'm not quite sure how but this b
5 matches
Mail list logo