Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] slob: Use slab_list instead of lru

2019-03-13 Thread Tobin C. Harding
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 07:05:02PM +, Christopher Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > > @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static void *slob_alloc(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int > > align, int node) > > continue; > > > > /* Attempt to alloc */ > > -

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] slob: Use slab_list instead of lru

2019-03-13 Thread Christopher Lameter
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static void *slob_alloc(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int > align, int node) > continue; > > /* Attempt to alloc */ > - prev = sp->lru.prev; > + prev = sp->slab_list.prev; >

[PATCH v2 4/5] slob: Use slab_list instead of lru

2019-03-12 Thread Tobin C. Harding
Currently we use the page->lru list for maintaining lists of slabs. We have a list_head in the page structure (slab_list) that can be used for this purpose. Doing so makes the code cleaner since we are not overloading the lru list. The slab_list is part of a union within the page struct (include