On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
> > Ok so that results in a mininum size object size of 2^(12 - 8) = 2^4 ==
> > 16 bytes on x86. This is not true for order 1 pages (which SLAB also
> > supports) where we need 32 bytes.
>
> According to current slab size calculating logic, slab whose object
2013/10/18 Christoph Lameter :
> n Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
>> To prepare to implement byte sized index for managing the freelist
>> of a slab, we should restrict the number of objects in a slab to be less
>> or equal to 256, since byte only represent 256 different values.
>> Setting
n Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> To prepare to implement byte sized index for managing the freelist
> of a slab, we should restrict the number of objects in a slab to be less
> or equal to 256, since byte only represent 256 different values.
> Setting the size of object to value equal or m
To prepare to implement byte sized index for managing the freelist
of a slab, we should restrict the number of objects in a slab to be less
or equal to 256, since byte only represent 256 different values.
Setting the size of object to value equal or more than newly introduced
SLAB_MIN_SIZE ensures
4 matches
Mail list logo