On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 07:40:37AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 06/21/2018 11:25 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 04:59:55PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>On 06/21/2018 04:53 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >>>On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 16:42 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Rather t
On 06/21/2018 11:25 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 04:59:55PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 06/21/2018 04:53 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 16:42 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
Rather than accessing the TPM functions using a NULL pointer, which
causes a lookup fo
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 04:59:55PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 06/21/2018 04:53 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 16:42 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>Rather than accessing the TPM functions using a NULL pointer, which
> >>causes a lookup for a suitable chip every time, get a hol
On 06/21/2018 04:53 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 16:42 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
Rather than accessing the TPM functions using a NULL pointer, which
causes a lookup for a suitable chip every time, get a hold of a tpm_chip
and access the TPM functions using this chip. We call the
On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 16:42 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Rather than accessing the TPM functions using a NULL pointer, which
> causes a lookup for a suitable chip every time, get a hold of a tpm_chip
> and access the TPM functions using this chip. We call the tpm_chip
> ima_tpm_chip and protect it
Rather than accessing the TPM functions using a NULL pointer, which
causes a lookup for a suitable chip every time, get a hold of a tpm_chip
and access the TPM functions using this chip. We call the tpm_chip
ima_tpm_chip and protect it, once initialization is done, using a
rw_semaphore called ima_t
6 matches
Mail list logo