Hi Andreas, I have incorporated your suggestions into another patch
that renames things in ext2/ext4 ("[PATCH 24/32] ext2, ext4: make mb
block cache names more explicit").
> Since we now also have the ea_inode cache, it would be better to rename
> s_mb_cache to s_mb_block_cache to make it more cle
On Jun 20, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Tahsin Erdogan wrote:
>
> Make names more generic so that mbcache usage is not limited to
> block sharing. In a subsequent patch in the series
> ("ext4: xattr inode deduplication"), we start using the mbcache code
> for sharing xattr inodes. With that patch, old mb_ca
On Jun 20, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Tahsin Erdogan wrote:
>
> Make names more generic so that mbcache usage is not limited to
> block sharing. In a subsequent patch in the series
> ("ext4: xattr inode deduplication"), we start using the mbcache code
> for sharing xattr inodes. With that patch, old mb_ca
Make names more generic so that mbcache usage is not limited to
block sharing. In a subsequent patch in the series
("ext4: xattr inode deduplication"), we start using the mbcache code
for sharing xattr inodes. With that patch, old mb_cache_entry.e_block
field could be holding either a block number
4 matches
Mail list logo
